People / Government & civic life

Zac Moore

Creek County District 2 commissioner

District roads, shared engineering and the county voice in regional workforce governance.

Zac Moore serves as Creek County’s District 2 commissioner after defeating the incumbent in 2024. His documented responsibilities connect district road operations with county financial oversight, INCOG, cooperative engineering and regional workforce governance.

What he can decide

Commissioners combine district road responsibilities with collective decisions about county business. Oklahoma State University’s guidance identifies roads and bridges, contracts, claims, purchases and financial oversight among the board’s duties. Agreements require majority action; Moore cannot commit the county simply by holding office. The county excise board separately approves funding for county offices. In January 2026, commissioners selected Stephens as chair and Whitehouse as vice-chair, with Moore serving as a board member. His vote and ability to propose action matter independently of those leadership titles. The distinction is visible in meeting minutes that name who moved, seconded and voted on each decision.

Career & public service

  1. June2024

    Election victory

    Reported 14-vote victory over the incumbent.

  2. January2025

    County service

    Participating in the January6 meeting; named county workforce consortium representative on January27.

  3. June2025

    Road equipment

    Board approved the proposed grader replacement agreement.

  4. January2026

    Engineering representation

    Designated county representative to Circuit Engineering District1.

  5. October2026

    Continuing service

    Current district page and county minutes confirm office.

People, institutions and the relationships between them

Following the connections

Each step below represents a documented relationship. Dates and roles belong to the individual links; a path can span different periods.

County authority
personZac Moore
public officeCreek County Commissioner District 2

District roads and collective county business.

Shared engineering
personZac Moore
public bodyCircuit Engineering District 1

County representation in a cooperative engineering district.

Workforce governance

Local elected official role, distinct from the separately listed workforce board.

Documented relationships

5 documented relationships · Historical and current roles remain distinct.

Current source roster

INCOG

Creek County representative

Current INCOG roster

No compensation, ownership or unilateral authority inferred. Appointment event kept separate from continuing service.

Historical record

Circuit Engineering District 1

Designated county representative

January5,2026 Resolution2026-1

No compensation, ownership or unilateral authority inferred. Appointment event kept separate from continuing service.

Financial controls and the public record

Countywide financial oversight is another part of the job. The State Auditor and Inspector’s report for the year ended June 30, 2025 identified weaknesses in Creek County’s federal recovery-fund procurement standards, expenditure reporting and supporting documentation. The report’s corrective-action plan assigned responsibilities to named county officials, including Stephens and County Clerk Jennifer Mortazavi. Those county findings should not be converted into an unsupported allegation that Moore personally diverted funds. They do provide a basis for following the board’s response and asking whether promised remedies were implemented. Target dates in a corrective-action plan alone do not establish completion.

County roads and regional responsibilities

Zac Moore is Creek County’s District 2 commissioner, a member of its three-person Board of County Commissioners and a Creek County representative on INCOG’s board. His district office provides a public route for submitting road concerns. County minutes record him serving alongside Newt Stephens and Jarrod Whitehouse in October 2026. His work also reaches beyond county meetings through Circuit Engineering District 1 and Green Country Workforce Development Board’s local elected officials consortium. These are separate public responsibilities, each with its own institutional setting.

A narrow election and a new public role

Moore defeated incumbent Leon Warner in the June 18, 2024 district contest. Sapulpa Times reported 695 votes for Moore and 681 for Warner, a margin of 14 votes. Moore described his effort as a grassroots campaign and said he wanted to represent district residents. Warner congratulated him and attributed part of the result to controversy over 911 answering-point boundaries. That explanation was Warner’s assessment, not a demonstrated account of why voters chose Moore. By January 6, 2025, official minutes show Moore participating in county business and abstaining from approval of the preceding December meeting’s minutes.

Engineering and workforce institutions

The county unanimously designated Moore its Circuit Engineering District 1 representative on January 5, 2026. The district’s own roster also lists him. Its cooperative model lets counties share engineering advice, inspections and transportation planning capacity. The statewide engineering-district association reports that Guy Engineering supplies management and coordination support for District 1, including work on five-year road and bridge construction plans. This establishes an institutional connection to the firm, without implying that Moore owns it or directs its private business. Separately, his INCOG board seat places him within the regional association alongside representatives of other local and tribal governments.

The county voice in workforce governance

On January 27, 2025, commissioners approved the Local Elected Official Consortium Agreement between Creek County and Green Country Workforce Development Board, replacing Warner with Moore. The organization’s current website confirms Moore under its local elected officials list, alongside Tulsa County’s Stan Sallee and representatives of other counties. It presents that list separately from its workforce board membership. Moore’s documented connection is therefore the county’s elected-official role, rather than a staff position or an inferred seat on the separately listed board. This relationship links county government to regional workforce services and their governance.

Equipment replacement and utility access

In June 2025, Moore explained to the county board that two older graders had high operating hours and costly maintenance needs. Commissioners unanimously approved a proposed trade-in and lease-purchase arrangement with Yellowhouse Machinery Company and authorized him to sign. In January 2026, Moore moved to approve the updated agreement after the new equipment’s model designation changed. These records establish approval and his stated reasoning; they do not establish realized savings. At the same January meeting, he proposed extending two Cimarron Telephone Company fiber-installation permits from 30 to 90 days. Both passed unanimously, illustrating his role in coordinating work affecting district roads.

Check the record

Sources & corrections

Research checked 2026-10-26. Roles and financial figures retain their source dates. Sections appear only when supported material is available; an omitted section is not a finding that no such relationship exists.

  1. INCOG board roster ↗

    primary · Source date 2026-08-17 · Checked 2026-10-25

    Direct October25 retrieval: August17,2026 roster lists vice-chair Chris Benge, Tulsa County. Distinct from Christian Bengel.

  2. October 13, 2026 county minutes ↗

    primary · Source date 2026-10-13 · Checked 2026-10-26

    Item 1: Stephens chairs meeting; Stephens, Moore and Whitehouse present.

  3. OSU Extension: elected county officials ↗

    primary · Checked 2026-10-26

    Board of County Commissioners: majority action, contracts, financial oversight; excise board final funding authority.

  4. Creek County FY2025 financial report and single audit ↗

    primary · Source date 2026 · Checked 2026-10-26

    Printed pp26–31 findings2025-009,010,011; PDFpp45–46 corrective action plan names Stephens and Mortazavi. Original50-pagePDF inspected. Fiscal year endedJune30,2025; response deadlines are targets, not completion certification.

  5. Creek County District 2 ↗

    primary · Checked 2026-10-26

    Current named commissioner and district road concern service.

  6. Sapulpa Times: Moore defeats Warner ↗

    independent-reporting · Checked 2026-10-26

    Micah Choquette, June19,2024; reported June18 results 695–681; candidate statements; portrait caption identifies Zac Moore. Photographer not credited.

  7. January 6, 2025 county minutes ↗

    primary · Checked 2026-10-26

    Items1–4 establish Moore participating as commissioner by January6; no exact oath date inferred.

  8. January 27, 2025 county minutes ↗

    primary · Checked 2026-10-26

    Item15 approves Local Elected Official Consortium agreement replacing Warner with Moore; item13 road REAP contract.

  9. Green Country Workforce governance ↗

    primary · Checked 2026-10-26

    Our Local Elected Officials: Creek County Zac Moore, distinct from Our Board list; regional workforce mission.

  10. Circuit Engineering District 1: purpose and board ↗

    primary · Checked 2026-10-26

    Cooperative engineering functions; board lists Moore for Creek County.

  11. OCCEDB: Circuit Engineering District 1 ↗

    primary · Checked 2026-10-26

    2025 directors; Guy Engineering provides management/coordination; five-year construction planning and new commissioner training.

  12. January 5, 2026 county minutes ↗

    primary · Checked 2026-10-26

    Items7–8 elect chair/vice-chair and designate Moore CED1 representative via Resolution2026-1.

  13. June 23, 2025 county minutes ↗

    primary · Checked 2026-10-26

    Item13: grader trade-in and lease-purchase approval, Moore explanation of maintenance risk; no verified savings or dollar amount claimed.

  14. January 28, 2026 county minutes ↗

    primary · Checked 2026-10-26

    Item11 revised motor grader agreement; items15–16 fiber permits extended30to90days; unanimous votes.

Submit a correction with supporting evidence ↗